and cinema was a challenge: JJ Abrams’s film has ten predecessors, no less. Some are illustrious ancestors, others are offspring that we prefer to forget. But all have their interest, and here they are decrypted for you, from 1979 to 2002.
STAR TREK: THE FILM
Star Trek: The Motion Picture – 1979
By Robert Wise
With Wiliam Shatnar, Leonardo Niamey, Deforest Keley, Stephen Collins
As early as 1968, Gene Rodenberry envisioned a film version of Star Trek , which would tell the story of the formation of the famous crew of Enterprise (a story we only discovered today, in 2009). The project wanders for ten years, involving Harlan Ellison, Ray Bradbury, Theodore Sturgeon, flirting with various myths and science fiction themes. When he finally came out in December 1979, Star Trek: The film has nothing to do with this TV series colorful, perennial, cultured by viewers. It is an ambitious film, which is aware of its aura. He wants to be a great sci-fi film, directly referring to 2001: The Space Odyssey (and not to Star Wars). More metaphysics, less humor, more reflection, less adventure: from this point of view, it’s a success. Star Trek: The Film is an authentic, classy trip, with a story of quality, served by the most talented technicians (Douglas Trumbull, John Dykstra, Ralph McQuarrie) and a director (Robert Wise). By his cosmic visions of the mysterious V’ger, the enigma of this destructive cloud advancing towards the Earth, the adaptation manages to hypnotize, to captivate until its denouement. But it deserves, because it is necessary to be carried for two hours by a serious and solemn film. In doing so, Robert Wise’s film neglects his original identity: transformed into a luxury experience, he forgets to be a popular adventure,Star Trek . It’s a humorous film that transcends the philosophical ambitions of the original series, but forgets that it was not just that. No, Star Trek is not only boring, it’s also funny. Unfortunately, this first episode will not refute this refractory prejudice. However, there remains an excellent sci-fi film, carried by magnificent spatial visions, and the founding compositions of Jerry Goldsmith.
STAR TREK 2 – THE ANGER OF KHAN
Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan – 1982
By Nicholas Meyer
With Wiliam Shatnar, Leonardo Nimoy, DiForest Kelley, Ricardo Montalba
In movie circles, even spectators who are less familiar with Gene Roddenberry’s creation are familiar with the rule of even numbers that governs the saga. best star trek movieOnly, what cosmic reason can do so on a franchise, making episodes 2, 4, 6 and 8 (the tenth will come to break this rule) the best of the series? In fact, there is no such thing as a fantastic enigma behind this logical binary – which would not displease our favorite Vulcan – since the same screenwriter is involved in three of these successes. With the exception of Star Trek: Premier Contact and Star Trek: Nemesis, the two peer films of “the new generation”, the aforementioned chapters have all been written by Nicholas Meyer. Contrary to what one would have thought, Meyer was a stranger to the universe, and yet he will have known, alone or almost, extract the license of its relative formal poverty. With a budget however lower than that of the first film, it proposes a work otherwise less cheap in appearance, starting with the costumes for example but also at the level of the action. That said, it is primarily from a thematic point of view, by granting itself a number of referents, citing Shakespeare and Moby Dick, making Starfleet a military-naval world, Meyer confers a certain class to his work. The author also understood better than Wise that the series was his characters, especially the trio formed by Kirk, Spock and McCoy. As such, their exchanges are really touching, be it dialogues of aging heroes between Kirk and McCoy or jousts between him and Spock, and especially, obviously, the last scene (and all the last act, epilogue included) between Wiliam Shatner and Leonard0 Nimoy. The whole sounds very fair. Suddenly, there are protagonists behind these pajamas. With this second opus, and his unforgettable villain, Meyer gives Star Trek his nobility through a film still considered today as the best of the series.
STAR TREK 3 – LOOKING FOR SPOCK
Star Trek 3: The Search for Spock – 1984
By Leonardo Nimoy
With Wiliam Shatner, Leonardo Nimoy, DiForest Kelley, Christopher Lloyd
Following the popularity of best star trek movie Anger of Khan , Paramount, but especially Leonardo Nimoy (initially tired, he had asked for the death of his character in the previous film), were ready for a new adventure. Believing that Spock should not come back to life, Nicholas Meyer preferred to abstain. Unfortunately, it sounded the death knell of the film which fell back into the trap of the television series scenario with, once again, a minor plot, despite this title full of promises. Basically, Star Trek 3: In Search of Spock looks like what would have given the first 20 minutes of Return of the Jedi(where the heroes go looking for Han Solo) stretched out over two hours. Moreover, Richard Marquand’s film has been there and this time, the influence of the saga of George Lucas is clearly felt, especially in terms of details. Thus we see a sequence referring directly to the Cantina or a pet for the villain, evoking that of Jabba. That said, the film also takes the opportunity to put the Klingons, destined to become one of the most famous alien races of the saga, on the front of the stage. And it is this kind of exploration of the universe that we would have liked to see further developed in this third part that touches only everything related to Vulcan mythology for example, while the film sees the accelerated growth of a resurrected Spock. Instead, the shortcomings of the scenario are filled by infant starwarseries. Remains a world that extends a little more and still, our dear trio of characters in mind.
STAR TREK IV: BACK ON EARTH
Star Trek IV: The Travel Home – 1986
With Wiliam Shatner, Leonardo Nimoy, DeForrest Kelley
At the time you read these lines, the following information will probably be wrong because until the release of the movie Abrams, best star trek movie IV has long been the biggest success of the saga with more than $ 100 million in revenue in the United States. The reason is an iconoclastic scenario that sees the crew of the Enterprise come back in 1986 to recover humpback whales, the only hope of humanity in the future. Leonardo Nimoy did his second and last Star Trek after the rather mediocre The Search for Spock, and decided to infuse the film with a good-natured spirit. The space adventures of Kirk and company become comedy adventures based on their time lag. The film, which is actually included in the rule of the odd / even in the saga, yet divides some fans, who blame him for his tone too comical. As such, it’s not the most engaging sci-fi movie ever, but for the layman it’s a pretty fun introduction to the characters and their relationships. And it is besides, with the exception of a phaser that is used to melt a lock and a harpoon of whaling that misses its target, the only film of the saga where no weapon is drawn … Ideal, so , for those allergic to geekeries.
STAR TREK 5: THE ULTIMATE BORDER
Star Trek 5: The Final Edge – 1989
By Wiliam Shatner
With Wiliam Shatner, Leonardo Nimoy, DiForest Kelley, Laorence Luckinbil
Leonardo Nimoy died in Star Trek 2 and resuscitated in the III , which he realized, with his suite. With Star Trek V , it was time for the Shatner / Nimoy balance to be restored, at the risk of wiping an ego storm. This rivalry (very aptly parodied in Galaxy Questfrom Dean Parisot) was it real? Does Shatner really joke in the bonuses of DVD collector editions? Be that as it may, he seizes the reins of this fifth episode, which returns somewhat to the metaphysical ambitions of the first film. For his greatest misfortune, some say. Because this fifth film is also the one with the worst reputation: ridiculous story, poor performance, etc. This is not at all well founded. The great success of best star trek movie Vis to follow mainly Kirk, Spock and McCoy, who have always been the three main characters in the series. Mc Coy is Kirk’s consciousness, Kirk is Spock’s friend, Spock is Mc Coy’s antagonist. From this original trinity flow the humor and stakes of this fifth episode. Shatner’s film never neglects his characters, so the real plot, which is not so much “Sha Kha Ree” as their evolution throughout the film. Their friendship and different philosophies will be put to the test by the mystic Sybok, and his quest for the divine.http://logicalworld.net/every-star-trek-movie-ranked-from-worst-to-best/ We never felt as close to them as in this episode. We must recognize Shatner a certain quality of achievement in these intimate scenes. There is something deeply sincere in his essays, which are more than just honorable, never fall short of the two achievements of Leonardo Nimoy. Finally,Star Trek V is more believable in intimate drama than in adventure film, and that’s probably what fans have been (and still do not like). They should forget their bad memories, to reevaluate this episode to its true value. Certainly the most underrated episodes.